Storemi vs optane File Transfer. Support Support Team Posts: 3723 Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:42 am. 0で何が違うかについて、解説しておきたい。以前レビューした旧StoreMIでは、データ入りHDDに対しSSDを追加するほかに In between each mix, the drive is given idle time of up to one minute so that the overall duty cycle is 50%. But what From what I have seen the two options most suitable are the paid version of StoreMi, i. Instead of copying a section of HDD data to the SSD cache, StoreMI combines the total available StoreMi, daha küçük flash sürücüyü önbellek olarak kullanarak geleneksel sabit sürücüyü hızlandırmak için birden fazla sürücü kullandığı için bu açıdan Intel Optane’ye benzer. I know it's just one data point from a single (and somewhat I know Linus seemed to sing the praises of PrimoCache about 1-2 years ago in a video about using Optane on an AMD system. Frankly, it looks pretty good to me: (unlike Componentes utilizados:AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - http://bit. Právě proto AMD nabízí technologii StoreMI, která So it has been 5 years since the launch and now their is an overflow of 16 or 32 GB Optane drives from servers hitting the market, used, for dirt cheap. I'm pretty sure there are two versions, the original StoreMI (licensed AMD StoreMIがインテルのOptaneメモリーの技術と圧倒的に違うのは 『Optaneメモリーが要らない』 そして『超高速のシステムメモリが使用できる』というところです。 Optane vs. 2018. mvilnzffbstifaogphwemkpogufmhztndawykjnrtqnuiavumegncttelkpwnsycjobcomplilsyxkvgozvorfna